Comments on Design Anthropology

Home » Uncategorized » Nike Considered. Please ‘Reconsider’.

Nike Considered. Please ‘Reconsider’.

Start here



Whilst we may have an enviable lifestyle (for some) down here in the Great Southern Land, one can’t help but feel a bit left out, a bit isolated, a bit ‘unconsidered’ as it were, when it comes to product innovation.

5-6 or so years ago, Nike was toying with the idea of doing more ecologically responsible shoes, and launched a very limited range of shoes it labeled ‘Nike Considered’.  I was excited about these shoes, as most shoes – especially sports shoes – are just a bunch of hydrocarbons that end up as landfill when they wear out.  To the point that I have about 15 years of shoes in my wardrobe in various states of (dis)repair, of which I only really wear about 3.  The rest just sit there, but I can’t bring myself to toss them out.

At the time, I didn’t have any money for new shoes, but I promised myself that if I did – and of course under the great assumption that they’d make it into shops in Australia – that I’d buy a pair or two.

Unfortunately they never did, and I never did, and before I knew it, in a puff of seemingly deliberate non-proof-of-concept smoke, the Considered line was gone.

Now as my wife will attest, I’m not into feet.  I like them covered with shoes.  Don’t get me wrong, I don’t have a phobia, I just appreciate a cool shoe more than I do someone’s feet.  They’re just too….functional.  Problem is, shoes kinda suck.  Like many things, they’ve been ‘over-designed’ – made for 15 bucks, sold for 150.  So now a month into my DA course, I’m in a ‘re-evaluation’ mindset, to the point that I’m even considering doing a course in shoe-making.

That was, until I saw these.


The shoes here are the Nike Long Ball Lace shoes.  No, you can’t buy them, because Nike decided there was no market for them, sold a few in Japan or whatnot, then apparently squirrelled-away the IP.  This, frankly, is insane.  If I made shoes, that’s exactly what I’d make.  Constructible, deconstructible, ecological, recyclable, great looking – they tick all my ‘good shoe’ boxes.  Take the paradigm of these shoes, apply it to anything, and it’s a winner from any perspective.

Now, I know what you’re thinking, right?  All Nike is doing, is generating all this niche IP (or perhaps more aptly, all possible directional future IP) developing it, making a few ducats, and then when it doesn’t gain traction, (make ‘surprised’ face) they shelve it.  This then gives them a huge library of patents to draw from, limits the viability of niche companies, allows them to control the dissemination of ideas, and probably a raft of other shitty things I haven’t thought of.  Including justification to pursue shittier designs that make more money.

“Yeah we tried eco shoes, nobody wanted them” etc.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: